Home Blog Page 26

Ripple Co-Founder Donates $1M in XRP to Kamala Harris Amid SEC Legal Battle

0

Ripple’s Chris Larsen Donates $1 Million in XRP to Kamala Harris as Crypto Politics Heat Up

Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen has made a major political donation in support of Kamala Harris, the current Vice President and a 2024 U.S. presidential candidate. Larsen’s contribution of $1 million in XRP (Ripple’s cryptocurrency) marks a significant moment in the intersection of cryptocurrencies and politics, showing how crypto leaders are stepping into political discourse ahead of the 2024 election.

The donation follows Larsen’s public endorsement of Harris in September 2024, where he, along with 88 other executives, signed an open letter backing Harris’s presidential bid. According to CNBC, this latest contribution brings Larsen’s total donations to Harris to over $1.9 million.

This donation comes at a time when cryptocurrencies have become a hot topic on the political stage. Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have touched on the growing crypto industry during their campaigns, with each candidate offering differing stances on how they would regulate and encourage the development of digital assets in the U.S.

Larsen’s Involvement with Ripple and the SEC Battle

While Larsen is busy supporting Kamala Harris, Ripple, the company he co-founded, is still entangled in a legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Ripple’s ongoing lawsuit with the SEC, which began in 2020, centers on the classification of XRP as a security. The legal tussle reached a judgment in August 2024, but both parties have filed appeals, extending the courtroom drama into late 2024.

Larsen’s high-profile donation and political involvement come at a pivotal time for Ripple. While Ripple continues to push for innovation within the blockchain space, the outcome of the SEC lawsuit could reshape the landscape of cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. The lawsuit is widely regarded as a landmark case that could influence how cryptocurrencies are classified and regulated in the future.

Also read: After SEC’s Top Crypto Cop Resigns, Is Gary Gensler Next?

The Political Debate on Crypto Heats Up

2024 marks the first election year where cryptocurrency has become a central issue in the political landscape. The race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump has seen both candidates weigh in on crypto regulations. Harris recently signaled her support for innovative technologies like cryptocurrencies, a shift from her previously neutral stance. A policy document released by her campaign outlines how her administration would “encourage” the growth of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency.

Harris’s new position contrasts with Donald Trump’s well-known pro-crypto stance. Trump, who has been vocal about his support for cryptocurrencies, sees digital assets as part of the future of American finance. The differing views on crypto regulation from both candidates will likely play a critical role in the upcoming election, with voters—and investors—closely watching to see how either candidate could shape the future of the industry.

Chris Larsen’s Role in Ripple and Crypto’s Evolution

Chris Larsen, who co-founded Ripple (formerly known as OpenCoin) in 2012, remains one of the most influential figures in the crypto space. Though he stepped down as Ripple’s CEO in 2016, Larsen continues to serve as the company’s executive chairman, playing a key role in its strategy and vision.

Ripple, known for its focus on cross-border payments using XRP, has become a cornerstone of the blockchain world. Larsen’s political donations indicate his desire to shape the broader policy environment for cryptocurrencies, ensuring that digital assets have a place in the future of U.S. finance. His donation to Kamala Harris suggests that Larsen believes Harris could be the candidate to foster a positive environment for blockchain innovation, while also tackling regulatory uncertainty.

The Future of Crypto in U.S. Politics

Larsen’s $1 million donation in XRP is just one part of a broader trend of crypto leaders engaging with politics. As the 2024 election approaches, cryptocurrencies are expected to remain a major talking point. The debate over how the U.S. should regulate and support the crypto industry will likely have long-lasting impacts on both the economy and financial markets.

Whether it’s Donald Trump’s continued push for a pro-crypto environment or Kamala Harris’s commitment to encouraging innovative technologies, the outcome of the 2024 election could be pivotal for the future of the cryptocurrency sector.

SEC Delays Decision on Spot Ethereum ETF Options Until December

0

SEC Delays Decision on Spot Ethereum ETF Options, Extending Deadline to December

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once again delayed its decision on whether to approve options tied to spot Ethereum (ETH) exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The regulator’s latest postponement extends the deadline for its ruling from October 19 to December 3, according to an October 11 filing.

The SEC’s decision revolves around a proposed rule change allowing the Cboe Exchange to list options on several spot Ethereum funds. These include notable funds such as BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, Fidelity’s Ethereum Fund, and Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust, among others.

This is not the first delay of its kind. In September, the SEC similarly postponed ruling on a separate proposal from Nasdaq’s electronic exchange, which sought approval to list options on the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF. This pattern of delays has left the crypto community awaiting a clear signal from regulators on the future of Ethereum-focused investment products.

Why SEC delays Ethereum Spot Option ETF

Bitcoin ETF Options Gaining Ground

While the SEC’s decision on Ethereum ETF options remains pending, it has already approved Bitcoin ETF options. On September 20, the SEC authorized Nasdaq to list options tied to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). However, the listing still awaits final clearance from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC).

James Seyffart, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, believes that options on Bitcoin ETFs could become available as soon as the first quarter of 2025. “I think before the end of the year is possible for options, but more likely in Q1 2025,” Seyffart said on October 9.

Also read: Crypto Fraudster Horst Jicha on the Run After Skipping $5 Million Bond Backlash

Ethereum ETF Options: The Next Frontier?

The addition of spot crypto options on regulated U.S. exchanges represents a significant advancement in the digital asset market. By offering these options, exchanges give institutional investors and financial advisers more tools to manage portfolio risk. Jeff Park, Bitwise Invest’s head of alpha strategies, referred to the listing of crypto options on regulated exchanges as a “monumental advancement” that creates “compelling opportunities” for investors.

In traditional markets, financial advisers often rely on options to hedge against sharp price movements. A survey by The Journal of Financial Planning found that over 10% of financial advisers actively used options in managing their clients’ portfolios in 2023. Since advisers control up to half of the investment flows in the $9 trillion ETF market, introducing crypto options could further solidify the integration of digital assets into mainstream financial markets.

FBI’s New Operation Token Mirrors Exposes Widespread Crypto Market Manipulation

0

FBI Creates Fake Cryptocurrency to Expose Massive Crypto Market Manipulation

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) has announced the culmination of Operation Token Mirrors, an extensive sting operation aimed at uncovering fraud in the digital asset markets. The investigation involved the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) taking the unprecedented step of creating a fake cryptocurrency and company, NexFundAI, to expose widespread crypto market manipulation.

NexFundAI: The Bait for Market Manipulators

NexFundAI was marketed as a cutting-edge cryptocurrency blending finance and artificial intelligence (AI). According to its website, the project aimed to serve as a secure store of value while also claiming to drive innovation in the AI sector. However, the token and the company were entirely fabricated by law enforcement to lure market manipulators into fraudulent activities.

Through NexFundAI, the FBI was able to catch individuals and entities engaging in illegal trading practices, such as wash trading — where the same financial instruments are bought and sold to artificially boost trading volumes — and pump-and-dump schemes, where token prices are fraudulently inflated to attract unsuspecting investors before being dumped for profit.

Fraudsters Caught in Operation Token Mirrors

As a result of the sting operation, 18 individuals and entities have been charged. These include high-profile market makers and their employees:

  • ZM Quant Investment LTD
  • CLS Global FZC, LLC
  • MyTrade MM
  • Gotbit Consulting LLC, and its CEO and directors
  • Saitama LLC
  • Robo Inu Finance
  • Lillian Finance LLC

The defendants are accused of executing fraudulent trades to inflate the value of their tokens, misrepresenting them as lucrative investments to attract retail investors.

Also read: Crypto Fraudster Horst Jicha on the Run After Skipping $5 Million Bond Backlash

Operation Token Mirrors By FBI

A Closer Look at Wash Trading and Pump-and-Dump Schemes

The court documents detail how the defendants used their own cryptocurrency tokens to create bogus trades and manipulate the market. By artificially inflating the value of these tokens, they misled new investors, creating a false sense of demand. Once prices spiked, the manipulators sold off their tokens, resulting in significant profits through illegal means.

As part of the investigation, more than $25 million in cryptocurrency was seized, and multiple trading bots used to facilitate wash trading for over 60 different cryptocurrencies were disabled.

Key Arrests and Charges

Among the individuals facing charges by the FBI are:

  • Aleksei AndriuninFedor Kedrov, and Qawi Jalili from Gotbit Consulting LLC
  • Riqui Liu and Baijun Ou from ZM Quant Investment LTD
  • Andrey Zhorzhes from CLS Global FZC, LLC
  • Liu Zhou from MyTrade MM
  • Michael Thompson from VZZN
  • Bradley Beatty from Lillian Finance LLC

Several defendants have already pleaded guilty or agreed to plead guilty, while three others were arrested in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Portugal.

SEC Warns Retail Investors to Stay Cautious

Sanjay Wadhwa, deputy director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, warned retail investors of the dangers posed by fraudulent market activity in the cryptocurrency sector. He emphasized that “purported promoters and self-anointed market makers” often target the public with false promises of profit, while manipulating the markets for their personal gain.

The FBI operation shows how retail investors are frequently victimized by deceptive practices in the crypto space, and highlights the ongoing risks of market manipulation.

The FBI’s innovative use of a fake cryptocurrency, NexFundAI, in Operation Token Mirrors has now opened up a new chapter in law enforcement’s fight against crypto fraud. The arrests and charges send a strong message to bad actors in the digital asset markets, while warning investors to be wary of schemes that promise unrealistic returns.

Critical Bug in Bitcoin Core Exposes 13% of Nodes to Remote Shutdown Attacks

0

A recent discovery in Bitcoin Core has revealed a critical vulnerability (CVE-2024-35202) that threatens the stability of over 13% of the asset’s nodes. The flaw, affecting Core versions before 25.0, allows hackers to execute remote shutdown attacks, putting the network at risk. This vulnerability stems from how the program handles “blocktxn” messages, leaving older nodes open to potential crashes.

Exploiting the Compact Block Protocol

The bug resides in Core’s compact block protocol, which is designed to optimize bandwidth by using shortened transaction IDs. While this method increases efficiency, it also leaves the network vulnerable. Hackers can exploit this weakness by creating conflicts, forcing nodes to request full block data that can lead to system failures.

This flaw, although unlikely to be exploited for financial gain, poses a serious risk to the network’s security. Malicious actors, such as governments or corporations, could potentially use this vulnerability to disrupt the infrastructure.

Vulnerability Report and Fix

Niklas Gögge, the researcher who identified and reported the bug, also contributed to the fix. Bitcoin Core version 25.0, released in May 2023, patches this vulnerability, improving overall network security. However, a significant portion of nodes has not yet been upgraded, leaving them exposed.

Also read: Bitcoin Gets a Boost as Mt. Gox Delays Mass Refund to 2025

Bug found in Bitcoin Core

The Importance of Updating Bitcoin Nodes

Currently, 13.7% of Bitcoin nodes remain vulnerable to remote shutdown attacks. The Bitcoin Core software does not automatically update, requiring node operators to manually download and install the latest versions. Developers strongly recommend that all node operators upgrade to the most recent version of Bitcoin Core to avoid potential disruptions.

The continuous efforts of Core developers have strengthened the security of the network. With version 28.0 already addressing another flaw discovered in September, the team remains dedicated to maintaining the system’s integrity without sacrificing functionality.

As Bitcoin continues to evolve, regular updates are essential to safeguard the network from potential threats. Node operators should remain vigilant and ensure they are running the latest software to protect against vulnerabilities like the one found in older Core versions. Upgrading not only enhances security but also ensures the network’s long-term resilience.

British James Howells Sues Council for $647M Over Lost Bitcoin in Landfill

0

James Howells, an IT engineer from Newport, Wales, is suing the Newport City Council for an eye-watering sum of 495 million British pounds (around $647 million). This lawsuit follows years of ongoing legal battles and rejected requests to dig up a local landfill. At the heart of this battle is a lost hard drive that, in 2013, Howells accidentally threw away during a routine household clearout. The hard drive contains 8,000 Bitcoin, which has since skyrocketed in value to nearly half a billion pounds.

The Lost Bitcoin

In 2013, Bitcoin was still a relatively niche asset, and the 8,000 BTC on Howells’ hard drive was worth about 1 million pounds (around $1.3 million). While cleaning his home, James Howells unknowingly discarded the wrong hard drive, thinking it was an empty or unused one. That hard drive, however, contained the private keys necessary to access his Bitcoin wallet, effectively locking him out of his digital fortune forever.

By the time Howells realized his mistake, the hard drive had already made its way to a local landfill, buried beneath tons of trash. As Bitcoin’s value soared in the following years, the stakes of this accidental loss became monumental. In today’s terms, those 8,000 Bitcoin are worth close to $647 million, making it one of the most significant cryptocurrency losses in history.

The Long Legal Battle

For over a decade, James Howells has been trying to gain permission to excavate the Newport landfill site where he believes the hard drive is buried. However, the Newport City Council has repeatedly rejected his requests, citing environmental concerns as the primary reason for denying the excavation. Despite Howells’ various proposals and attempts to mitigate these concerns, the council has remained steadfast in their opposition.

Howells’ latest legal move is his lawsuit for nearly half a billion pounds in damages against the council for preventing him from recovering his hard drive. He argues that the council’s refusal to grant him permission to dig up the landfill has directly led to his inability to retrieve his Bitcoin fortune. The court claim is set to be heard in December, where Howells will make his case against the council’s actions.

Also read: Bitcoin Gets a Boost as Mt. Gox Delays Mass Refund to 2025

Environmental Concerns Halts Excavation

The Newport City Council has maintained its position throughout the years, arguing that the environmental risks associated with digging up the landfill far outweigh the potential financial reward. The landfill has been flagged for breaches of its environmental permit, including elevated levels of hazardous materials such as asbestos, arsenic, and methane.

The council claims that any attempt to excavate the landfill could disturb these harmful materials, potentially posing a serious environmental and public health risk. As a result, they argue that allowing Howells to dig through the site to retrieve his hard drive would be both dangerous and irresponsible.

The council also pointed out that its operations are subject to strict monitoring and compliance protocols, which are in place to ensure that the landfill does not pose a threat to the surrounding environment. Allowing a large-scale excavation would, in their view, compromise the integrity of the site and potentially lead to significant environmental damage.

Man loses BTC to landfill in United Kingdom

Howells’ High-Tech Plans for Recovery

Undeterred by the council’s rejections, James Howells has proposed several creative solutions to recover his hard drive safely. In 2022, he reportedly pitched a detailed $11 million recovery plan, which included the use of advanced technology and robotics to sift through the landfill’s garbage without causing environmental disruption.

According to James Howells, the plan would involve the deployment of automated systems designed to sort through the waste and identify potential locations of the hard drive, thereby minimizing the need for extensive manual excavation. This plan would not come at any cost to the council, as Howells has already secured private funding for the project. In exchange for permission to proceed, Howells even offered to share 10% of the recovered Bitcoin value with the council, which would amount to tens of millions of pounds.

Despite these efforts, Newport City Council has remained firm in its stance, expressing doubts about both the legality and feasibility of Howells’ recovery plans. They have raised concerns over whether the technology would be effective in such an unpredictable environment and whether the excavation could truly be carried out without causing harm.

A Lengthy Battle: 10 Years of Setbacks

James Howells’ quest to retrieve his lost Bitcoin has now stretched over a decade. From the moment he realized his mistake in 2013, he has made numerous attempts to secure access to the landfill, but each time, he has been met with resistance. Initially, Howells tried to appeal directly to the council with a variety of recovery proposals, only to face repeated rejections.

In the early years of his fight, Bitcoin was still a relatively new and misunderstood asset, which may have contributed to the council’s reluctance to take his requests seriously. As time passed and Bitcoin’s value skyrocketed, the stakes of the situation became more evident, but the council’s position did not change. Over the years, James Howells has garnered media attention and public support, with many people sympathizing with his plight and expressing frustration at the council’s refusal to allow the excavation.

Howells’ Last Resort

With the Newport City Council continuing to block his efforts, Howells has now resorted to legal action as his final attempt to recover his fortune. The lawsuit, which is set to be heard in December, will see James Howells and his legal team argue that the council’s refusal to allow the excavation has caused him significant financial harm. He is seeking 495 million pounds (roughly $647 million) in damages to compensate for the value of the Bitcoin that he believes could have been recovered if the council had granted him access to the landfill.

James Howells’ legal team will likely argue that the environmental concerns cited by the council could have been mitigated through the use of advanced technology and careful planning. They may also point to the fact that Howells had offered to share a portion of the recovered Bitcoin with the council, which would have provided a financial incentive for cooperation.

The Bigger Picture

James Howells’ case shows that the value of Bitcoin and other digital assets can increase dramatically over time, turning what might have once been a relatively small investment into a life-changing fortune. However, these assets are also highly vulnerable to being lost or stolen if not stored securely.

For James Howells, the mistake of accidentally discarding his hard drive has cost him nearly half a billion pounds. His decade-long legal battle highlights the importance of safeguarding cryptocurrency wallets and private keys. Investors should take care to store their hardware wallets and private keys in secure, offline locations, and to back up their recovery phrases in multiple places to avoid similar losses.

In a world where digital assets are becoming increasingly valuable, the importance of secure storage cannot be overstated. As James Howells continues his fight to recover his lost Bitcoin, his story stands as a powerful reminder of the high stakes involved in managing cryptocurrency.

A Decade-Long Battle for Bitcoin

As the court date approaches in December, the future of James Howells’ legal battle remains uncertain. Will the court side with Howells and force the Newport City Council to allow the excavation, or will the council’s environmental concerns prevail?

Scroll’s Binance Listing Ignites Centralization Debate Amid Strategic Growth Moves

0

Scroll, the Ethereum layer-2 solution, has made headlines after its recent listing on Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. The announcement on Oct. 11 has sparked lively debate within the crypto community, with some questioning whether the project is compromising on its core principles of decentralization. Despite the criticisms, the leadership defends the move as a strategic step to foster global growth and broaden the project’s ecosystem.

The Centralization Debate

The listing of Scroll on Binance received mixed reactions from the crypto community. Some enthusiasts praised the move, noting its potential to enhance visibility and adoption. However, critics argue that by partnering with a centralized exchange (CEX) like Binance, Scroll risks diluting its decentralization ethos.

A prominent user on X (formerly Twitter), Zeng Jiajun, described Scroll’s decision as “kneeling” to a centralized entity. He acknowledged the difficulty of the decision but expressed concern about the long-term implications of aligning with a CEX. This sentiment echoes broader concerns within the decentralized finance (DeFi) community, where partnerships with centralized platforms are often viewed with suspicion.

Also read: Bitcoin Nears New Record for Longest Post-Halving Sideways Market

Strategic Decision for Growth

Scroll’s co-founder, Ye Zhang, quickly addressed the concerns, explaining that the Binance partnership is part of a well-planned strategy aimed at accelerating the project’s global expansion, particularly in emerging markets. Zhang stressed that partnering with Binance would provide Scroll with valuable on-ramp and off-ramp services, making it easier for users to move funds in and out of the Scroll ecosystem.

I don’t think partnering with Binance is ‘kneeling to a CEX for listing’. It’s a strategic move to build a partnership for growth and broader support. However, it is indeed a tough decision.

Zhang said, defending the decision

Zhang further highlighted the importance of strong CEX backing in achieving real global reach, particularly when competing with established networks like Tron in key markets. According to him, expanding user categories within the Ethereum ecosystem requires the kind of support only a major exchange like Binance can offer.

Concerns from Decentralization Advocates

Despite the co-founder’s reassurances, many in the community remain unconvinced. Ether advocates, such as Zeng Jiajun, expressed disappointment with Scroll’s decision to pursue Binance as a launch partner. Some critics argue that if Scroll’s blockchain had sufficient activity and user engagement, Binance would have listed it organically without the need for a formal partnership.

Other users on X pointed out that centralized exchanges should not be the first option for decentralized projects looking to expand. They believe that relying on CEX listings undermines the very foundations of decentralization that Ethereum layer-2 solutions like Scroll are meant to support.

Balancing Decentralization and Growth

In the face of these concerns, Zhang maintained that building a competitive ecosystem with a strong global presence sometimes requires partnerships with centralized entities. He argued that without CEX support, competing with networks like Tron and attracting new users to Ethereum’s ecosystem would be much more difficult.

Zhang also sought to address token distribution worries, clarifying that Scroll’s launch pool allocation comes from the ecosystem and growth category. He assured community members that this allocation does not affect the upcoming community airdrop.

Scroll’s listing on Binance has undoubtedly triggered an important debate about the role of centralization in the crypto space. While some view the move as a betrayal of decentralization principles, others believe it is a necessary step for expanding Scroll’s global reach. As Scroll navigates these challenges, it will be interesting to see how the project balances its commitment to decentralization with the need for growth and adoption in an increasingly competitive market.

SHOCKING: Crypto Companies Pay Record $19 Billion in Settlements to US Regulators in 2024

0

Crypto Companies Paid $19B in Settlements to US Regulators in 2024

CoinGecko’s recent report reveals that United States regulators have received over $19 billion in settlements from cryptocurrency companies in 2024. This staggering amount represents nearly two-thirds of all settlements collected since 2019, further highlighting the heightened regulatory scrutiny in the crypto space.

One of the largest contributors to this total is FTX and its affiliated trading firm Alameda, which paid a whopping $12.7 billion to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in an August 2024 settlement. The report also noted that the overall settlement amount in 2024 reflects a 78% increase from 2023, where crypto companies paid $10.87 billion. This surge is a massive 8,327% increase compared to settlement amounts in 2022.

Also read: Bybit Expands MT5 Platform to Include Indices Trading for Crypto Users

Key Events Driving the Surge in Settlements

The collapse of major crypto firms, such as Celsius and Terraform Labs in mid-2022, triggered an avalanche of lawsuits and regulatory investigations. These incidents marked the shift from the crypto bull run to the bear market and culminated in the collapse of FTX, which prompted stricter regulatory actions.

Crypto Companies Paid $19B in Settlements to US Regulators in 2024

Terraform Labs faced a $4.47 billion settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in response to the collapse of its algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) in 2022. Meanwhile, Genesis, another key player, reached a $2 billion settlement with the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in August 2024.

Regulatory Action Peaks in Recent Years

According to CoinGecko’s analyst Lim Yu Qian, the crypto industry has witnessed more settlements in the last two years than in all the previous years combined. This sharp increase is attributed to the regulatory crackdowns following the crypto market’s downturn, with many firms unable to withstand the bear market’s pressure.

Binance’s Billion-Dollar Settlement: A Landmark Case

One notable settlement in 2023 was Binance’s agreement to pay billions to settle charges, including violations of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements. Binance remains the only operational crypto company that has reached a settlement of this magnitude with US regulators, further illustrating the expanding focus on crypto regulation and compliance.

Investigation Uncovers MrBeast’s $10M Massive Profit from Low-Cap Crypto Tokens

0

Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, a YouTube superstar with over 320 million followers, has been thrust into the spotlight not for his viral stunts, but for his involvement in the crypto space. According to a recent on-chain investigation by crypto sleuth SomaXBT, MrBeast may have pocketed over $10 million by promoting low-cap crypto tokens, a move raising eyebrows within the industry.

MrBeast’s Crypto Earnings Exposed

SomaXBT, an anonymous but reputable figure in the crypto community, revealed in an October 11 post that MrBeast earned millions by endorsing Initial DEX Offerings (IDOs) for crypto projects such as Polychain Monsters (PMON) and Virtue Poker (VPP).

The investigation suggests that Donaldson’s wallet, identified through Arkham Intelligence, profited significantly from these projects. The findings point to an estimated $10 million in earnings for the YouTube star.

Pump-and-Dump Allegations

SomaXBT claims that the practice resembles what’s often referred to as a pump-and-dump scheme. MrBeast, by promoting these tokens to his vast audience, could influence a surge in their value. Once the prices spiked, MrBeast allegedly sold off his holdings, leaving average investors facing significant losses. SomaXBT was vocal on social media, stating, 

This is the shady stuff they’ve all done in the crypto market. If they had done this in the stock market, the SEC would be after them.

The allegation is a serious ethical concern. If accurate, it shows how influencers with large followings can manipulate the market, affecting the livelihoods of regular crypto investors.

SuperFarm ($SUPER) and Other Token Promotions

Crypto Investigation Uncovers MrBeast’s $10M Profits From Low-Cap Tokens

One of the most prominent cases flagged by SomaXBT involves Donaldson’s dealings with the SuperFarm DAO ($SUPER) token. The investigation suggests that MrBeast invested $100,000 in the project, receiving 1 million $SUPER tokens. SomaXBT alleges that MrBeast eventually sold these tokens for approximately 1,900 ETH, valued at $3.7 million at the time. Further vesting allegedly netted him another $5.5 million, bringing his total earnings from $SUPER to around $9 million.

Also read: Bybit Expands MT5 Platform to Include Indices Trading for Crypto Users

Similar allegations were made regarding other tokens. For example, SomaXBT pointed out that a $25,000 investment in Polychain Monsters ($PMON) reportedly yielded $1.7 million in profits. The $SHOPX token supposedly brought in $765,000 from a $25,000 investment, while earnings from the STAK token were estimated at $1.25 million.

Tokens Facing Major Devaluations

While MrBeast’s alleged profits were impressive, the investigation also highlighted the downfall of several of these projects. SomaXBT noted that many of the tokens MrBeast promoted have since faced major devaluations, with some seeing their prices plummet by over 90% from their peak. Some projects rebranded or pivoted in response to their losses.

Crypto’s Ethical Dilemma

SomaXBT’s investigation underscores the larger issue of influencer involvement in the crypto space. The investigator argued that such behavior would likely trigger regulatory scrutiny if it occurred in the stock market. He compared these actions to pump-and-dump schemes, where influential figures artificially inflate the price of assets before selling off their holdings for profit. In traditional markets, this is illegal and punishable by regulatory bodies like the SEC.

MrBeast’s NFT History Resurfaces

This isn’t the first time MrBeast’s crypto dealings have drawn attention. SomaXBT reminded the crypto community of MrBeast’s earlier foray into the world of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). A tweet from Donaldson showed his support for Gary Vee’s VeeFriends project, in which he publicly stated that he had “loaded up” on VeeFriends, another example of his involvement in speculative crypto investments.

What Lies Ahead?

As crypto markets remain largely unregulated, influencer-backed token promotions pose a growing risk to unsuspecting investors. The revelations from SomaXBT’s investigation serve as a cautionary tale for both regulators and traders, highlighting the importance of transparency and ethical practices in the rapidly evolving crypto space.

MrBeast’s team has yet to respond to the allegations, but with public scrutiny growing, it remains to be seen how this will impact his future involvement in crypto projects.

UN Calls for Urgent Action on Crypto-Enabled Crimes in Southeast Asia

0

UN Agency Urges Action Against Crypto-Enabled Crimes in Southeast Asia

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has raised serious concerns about the increasing use of cryptocurrency to facilitate illicit activities in Southeast Asia. In a recent report, the agency called for urgent intervention, emphasizing the need for better monitoring, enhanced regulatory oversight, and improved training for law enforcement to combat organized crime involving cryptocurrencies.

Rising Threats from Crypto-Linked Crimes

The report points to a troubling trend: the growing use of cryptocurrencies by criminal enterprises operating within Southeast Asia’s underground banking systems, casinos, junkets, and illegal online gambling platforms. These groups have embraced crypto as a method to carry out fraud, money laundering, and other forms of cybercrime with greater ease and anonymity. The lack of sufficient regulation and the rise of high-risk virtual asset service providers (VASPs) in the region have exacerbated the problem, providing a new avenue for these criminal operations to thrive.

According to the report, while not all scams in the region involve cryptocurrency, it has become a favored method of payment due to the speed and simplicity of cross-border transactions. Criminals use the relative anonymity of cryptocurrency to bypass traditional banking regulations, making it harder for authorities to trace funds.

Also read: Indiana Man Pleads Guilty to $37M Cryptocurrency Theft from 571 Victims in 2022 Cyberattack

UNODC Calls for Stronger Oversight and Law Enforcement Training

To combat these growing threats, the report recommends several key actions, including better regulatory oversight of crypto-related activities and improved monitoring of organized crime within casinos, junkets, and cyber fraud operations. It also emphasizes the importance of equipping law enforcement agencies with the tools and training necessary to detect and dismantle money laundering schemes enabled by cryptocurrencies.

Crypto Transactions Fueling Crime in Southeast Asia, says UN report

Masood Karimipour, UNODC’s Regional Representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific, highlighted the growing sophistication of these criminal enterprises, stating,

Leveraging technological advances, criminal groups are producing larger scale and harder to detect fraud, money laundering, underground banking, and online scams. This has led to the creation of a criminal service economy.

Tether (USDT) in the Spotlight for Criminal Use

One cryptocurrency that has drawn significant attention from the UNODC is Tether (USDT), particularly on the TRON blockchain. The report identifies Tether as the preferred stablecoin for transnational criminal networks in East and Southeast Asia, largely due to its efficiency in transferring stolen funds. On-chain analysis reveals that USDT has been linked to numerous high-risk transactions, including those tied to online gambling platforms, cyber fraud schemes, and high-risk exchanges.

Alarmingly, some of these transactions involve wallets associated with entities sanctioned by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), including North Korea’s notorious Lazarus Group, known for cyberattacks and hacking activities. Tether’s association with large-scale criminal operations such as drug and human trafficking, cybercrime, and even the distribution of child sexual abuse material has further cemented its role in illicit finance.

Is Crypto’s Role in Crime Overstated?

Despite the growing concern over the use of cryptocurrencies in illicit activities, some reports suggest that these fears may be exaggerated. For example, a report from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) noted that regulated cryptocurrency platforms play a crucial role in aiding law enforcement by utilizing the transparency of blockchain technology to track and combat illegal activities.

In fact, according to data from Merkle Science, only a small fraction of USDT transactions—0.61% between July 2021 and June 2024—were flagged as potentially illicit. Similarly, only 0.22% of transactions involving USD Coin (USDC) were flagged during the same period. These findings highlight that, while cryptocurrency is indeed used by criminals, it represents only a tiny portion of the overall financial crime landscape compared to traditional forms of money laundering involving cash.

Further reinforcing this point, a report by Chainalysis revealed that illicit crypto activity accounted for only 0.34% of total on-chain transactions in 2023. This relatively low figure suggests that while cryptocurrencies can be used for illegal purposes, their role in global crime may not be as significant as some critics claim.

As Southeast Asia emerges as a key testing ground for transnational criminal networks, the UNODC’s call for stronger oversight and better law enforcement training is timely. While cryptocurrencies like Tether are being used by criminals for nefarious purposes, the overall percentage of illicit transactions in the crypto space remains small when compared to traditional financial crimes. Nonetheless, the increasing sophistication of criminal enterprises and their use of cryptocurrency to evade detection underscores the need for continued vigilance and regulatory improvements in the region.

Uptick in Offline Crypto Thefts: ZachXBT Warns Crypto Traders of Rising In-Person Robberies

0

ZachXBT Claims Rise in Offline Crypto Theft Targeting Traders

ZachXBT, a prominent blockchain investigator, has reported a worrying rise in in-person attacks on cryptocurrency traders. According to his recent findings, physical thefts targeting crypto holders, especially through home invasions, have become more frequent. These incidents are not isolated cases; they represent a broader shift towards offline criminal activity in the cryptocurrency space.

The Rise in Physical Crypto Robberies

In an Oct. 10 post, ZachXBT disclosed that he has received an increasing number of messages from victims of home invasion robberies across Western Europe. In these cases, attackers break into victims’ homes and forcibly steal their cryptocurrency. In a particularly alarming case, a trader lost $4.3 million worth of crypto during a home invasion in June 2024.

The perpetrators reportedly obtained the victim’s personal details, including their home address, after a data breach. Pretending to be delivery personnel, the criminals entered the house armed with machetes and forced the victim to transfer funds to two wallet addresses, which remain inactive to this day.

A Troubling Trend of Offline Crypto Theft

This disturbing trend represents a shift in how thieves target cryptocurrency. Historically, cyberattacks such as phishing scams and hacking were the primary methods used to steal digital assets. Now, as more people hold valuable cryptocurrency, criminals are resorting to physical violence. ZachXBT noted that this rise in offline attacks, especially in Western Europe, signals a serious risk for crypto holders who may be unaware of the physical threats posed by their digital wealth.

The blockchain investigator shared additional details via his Telegram channel in late September, revealing that several high-profile individuals in the crypto community had been held at gunpoint and forced to transfer their assets in recent months.

GitHub’s Record of Offline Crypto Thefts

ZachXBT has warned traders about the rise in threats to offline wallets

ZachXBT’s claims are supported by data from the online platform GitHub, which tracks incidents of offline crypto theft. Over the last year, there have been at least 15 reported cases globally. In 2023 alone, 17 such incidents were documented, compared to 32 cases in 2021. GitHub’s list of offline thefts dates back to 2014, when cryptographer Hal Finney was reportedly the target of an extortion attempt involving 1,000 Bitcoin.

These numbers highlight the increasing prevalence of in-person crypto crimes. What began as isolated incidents has now escalated into a consistent threat, with criminals going to great lengths to steal digital assets.

Also read: Indiana Man Pleads Guilty to $37M Cryptocurrency Theft from 571 Victims in 2022 Cyberattack

High-Profile Cases of Crypto Home Invasions

One of the more notorious cases involved Nick Drakon, the former CEO of crypto research platform Revelo Intel. On Sept. 5, 2024, Drakon revealed in a social media post that he and his family had been targeted and robbed by a sophisticated criminal group. The thieves reportedly surveilled his home and held his wife and eight-month-old son hostage while forcing him to transfer personal and company funds. Drakon later stepped down from his position due to the trauma caused by the incident.

Another recent case occurred in Florida, where a man was convicted on June 25, 2024, for leading multiple violent home invasions aimed at stealing crypto assets. Between December 2022 and July 2023, the gang carried out several attacks, using kidnapping, violence, and threats to force victims to transfer their cryptocurrency holdings.

Protecting Yourself from Crypto Theft

ZachXBT urged crypto holders to take extra precautions to protect themselves, both online and offline. He advised against sharing personal information, particularly details about crypto holdings, on social media or with acquaintances, as this can make traders easy targets for criminals.

To reduce the risk of being physically targeted, crypto holders should also:

  • Use pseudonyms online to maintain anonymity.
  • Store hardware wallets in secure, undisclosed locations.
  • Keep private keys and recovery phrases secure, possibly using secure, offline methods.
  • Install security systems in their homes and be cautious of unexpected visitors.

In-person attacks may be less common than online hacks, but they present a growing threat as cryptocurrency continues to rise in value. Staying vigilant and taking extra security measures are essential steps for anyone involved in the crypto space.